 |  |
 |  |  |
 |

Your prayers are needed at this time for Michael Badnarik. Jessica, I just received word that the President of the 2009 Continental Congress and 2004 Presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party, Michael Badnarik had a Heart Attack this morning and in an unconscious state. His condition is serious. His Mother, Elaine, reported to me that Michael was in Madison, Wisconsin attending a hearing regarding a raw milk case. After the hearing he got in a car to go to lunch with friends, He then slumped over. His friends attempted CPR and contacted the paramedics. They attempted to revive him 3 times with no success. Upon the 4th attempt his heart was revived yet with erratic behavior. He was taken by helicopter to Gunderson Lutheran Hospital CCU in Lacrosse, WI. Please do no call or visit the hospital, only family is allowed. He has been fitted with a temporary pacemaker and a balloon pump to ease stress on his heart. I have no further details at this time. Please watch your email box for an update. Michael is a true asset and leader in our movement who works tirelessly and selflessly for freedom. Please pray for Michael at this time. In Freedom, Gary Franchi National Director Restore the Republic Linked to me from: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=223891
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |
so i have this data which turned out to be bimodal. (i was so blind in scoring it, i was triple-blind!) let's call this score number s. i want to describe and test this data in terms of one factor (on or off). most of "on" is in one peak, most of "off" is in the other peak. (by pretty large values of "most", especially in the "on" case, as it happens.) i am sorta thinking about this in two ways: . if f=(1,0), p(s)= ? or . for s=(0-26), p(f=(0,1)) = ? are these the reasonable models, or given that i have two kinda gaussian curves with a nice valley of nuthin' in between, is there some other way i should look at it? and what would be reasonable tests to poke this with to try to generate some lovely p-values? thanks for any thoughts :) (eta over in my own journal i posted a "disease/exposure" 2x2 matrix analysis, which is SUPER LAME i know but i still got a nice teeny-weeny p-value. ;) I feel :  contemplative
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |

I suppose, every libertarian should be against any state invasion in any issues. But the worst kind of state invasion is when one state impose its colonial rule to another nation. Therefore, I guess, every true libertarian has to support the fair struggle of Pacific Unity League for independance. If you can't or don't wish go to NC, then you might support PUL by donation. This large Pacific island was discovered by James Cook in 1774, and named Caledonia, the ancient name of Scotland, Cook's homeland. Favorable island climatic conditions and fertile soil had attracted the interest of European colonizers - traders, planters and missionaries. In 1853 France announced the island its colony. Then within 30 years the French government had deported many convicted criminals to New Caledonia. The struggle for independence of the Kanak people, indigenous people of New Caledonia, has a long and glorious history. A new stage of this struggle began in 1985 when “Kanak and Socialist National Liberation Front”, led by the outstanding son of the Kanak people Jean-Marie Tjibaou, started its activity. FLNKS had advocated the establishment of an independent Kanak state. The events on the Ouvéa Island in 1988 became culmination of the struggle. FLNKS fighters had taken hostage 27 French gendarmes and judge and demanded immediate independence. The French colonial authorities sent a special commando unit. As a result of bloody clashes, the rebels were forced to let gendarmes off. Jean-Marie Tjibaou was assassinated. But the colonizers realized that they can not longer maintain their dominance in the previous form and made some concessions. According to the Matignon (1988) and Nouméa (1998) Accord, New Caledonia
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |

FCS: Last night, Villanova slugged out a tough victory over Montana to win their first Division I football championship, 23-21. Montana led 14-13 at the half, before Nova scored 14 unanswered in the second half to take a 23-14 lead. Montana closed to within two with a minute to play, but the onside kick attempt tumbled out of bounds, giving the Wildcats possession and the ability to kill the clock. It's the Grizzlies' second consecutive loss in the FCS title game, but they've won twice before so it's not the end of the world in Missoula. Both teams finish the season with 14-1 records.
Interestingly, with Villanova currently ranked #9 in the basketball polls, there's the chance here for a team to win the "official" Division I football and basketball titles in the same school year for the first time ever.
D-III: The last team to beat Mount Union, Wisconsin-Whitewater, beat them again today, scoring 10 minutes in the final 77 seconds to break a 28-28 tie and win 38-28. It's Whitewater's second Division III title, the first being their win over Mount Union in 2007. Mount Union's winning streak ends at 29 games, and their season concludes with a 14-1 record. Whitewater, on the other hand, finishes 15-0 and now (obviously) hold the longest active winning streak in D-III.
NAIA: Braden Wieking kicked a 42-yard field goal late in the fourth quarter to break a tie in a bit of a see-saw battle, and gave Sioux Falls (15-0) a 25-22 win over Lindenwood (13-1). It's Sioux Falls' fourth NAIA title, and third in the last four years. They've only got one more chance to add to that total, as they'll be moving "up" to NCAA D-II in 2011. I say "up" in quotes because the competition level is actually about equal, but you know how people perceive things -- headed up by the fact that teams currently in the NCAA have accounted for 50 of the 81 NAIA football titles. (The first NAIA football championship wasn't until 1956, but there were two divisions for 27 years, between 1970-1996.)
Nobody except for Sioux Falls and Carroll (MT) have won the NAIA football title since Georgetown (KY) repeated in 2000-2001.
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |

TIME Magazine officially sucks.The TIME Person of the Year for 2009 is...Ben Bernanke. Ben fucking Bernanke. I missed it because I usually don't give a whit who is or isn't TIME's Person of the Year, considering my continual process of "waking up" and realizing these rags for what they are...but seriously? But Bernanke also knows the economy would be much, much worse if the Fed had not taken such extreme measures to stop the panic. There's a vast difference between 10% and 25% unemployment, between anemic and negative growth. He wishes Americans understood that he helped save the irresponsible giants of Wall Street only to protect ordinary folks on Main Street. He knows better than anyone how financial crises spiral into global disasters, how the grass gets crushed when elephants fall. "We came very, very close to a depression ... The markets were in anaphylactic shock," he told TIME during one of three extended interviews. "I'm not happy with where we are, but it's a lot better than where we could be."
Yeah right. As if anything else needs to be said, I turn only to the first page of Mish's Global Economic Analysis, which reads: "Seven Banks Fail, 140 YTD total, Sheila Bair 'prepared to handle an ever-larger number of bank failures next year'". Uh-huh. I have no idea what to say, other than the obvious: the editors of TIME are twats. I feel :  infuriated
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/44912.htmlIt seems Peter needs to spend some more time w/ Ron Paul. The golden boy may know what he's talking about w/ economics but be on the PRO-PREEMPTIVE WAR bus, directly against the US constitutional mandate to 'keep out of it' so to speak. Send him a message to show your dismay/disapproval, wish to re-educate etc. ----------- Schiff just defended PREEMPTIVE WAR! He gave an example using the false claim that “If Iran was making a nuclear weapon as they are supposedly doing…,” then stated “I’d ask the Iranians to let our inspectors in, then if they didn’t we’d blow them up.” ----------- Information info@schiffforsenate.com Finance contributions@schiffforsenate.com Thanks to my Antiwar.com buddies.
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |

 We have already written about the difficult fate of the Pacific state of Nauru after independence. It would be very unpleasant if another jewel of the Pacific - Solomon Islands, repeated the same mistakes. Solomon Islands achieved independence from Britain in 1978. This state with a population of over half million people consists nearly a thousand islands, whose total area is 28 thousand square km. A very significant part of the Solomon Islands population continues living in the conditions of traditional society, preserving its tribal and community structures. This is largely due to the fact that European colonizers settled on the Solomon Islands later than on the other Oceania archipelagos since they were given hard rebuff their activity. Only in the 60s years of the XIX century, the European traders, planters and missionaries succeeded a firm foothold on the islands. Since 1870, European slave traders and recruiters started to deliver the Solomon Islands inhabitants for working to the plantations in the Australian province of Queensland. The islanders were sold also to work on plantations in Fiji, New Caledonia and Samoa. While the islanders put up armed resistance, the slave traders were mercilessly killing those who resist or those who tried to flee. They staged bloody punitive expeditions and burned villages. The thousands islanders were dead of poor conditions and diseases on the plantations. The legacy of the dark period Anglo-Australian colonization is a lopsided economy based on exports such goods as tropical timber, fish, copra and cocoa. But even this undeveloped economy has been undermined as a result of tribal conflict in 1999-2003. In fact, the country has only just regained its economy. The state is now at the crossroads. Solomon Islands, like Nauru, are rich in mineral resources. There are explored deposits of lead, zinc, nickel, gold, bauxite and phosphates. But the only
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |
First the Link: http://espn.go.com/blog/pac10/print?id=6381If the PAC-10 were to expand, I'd imagine Utah and BYU get the nod and Boise gets left out, and here's why: Look at the conference... it is designed nicely for rivalries amongst the 10 teams: USC vs. UCLA Arizona vs. Arizona State Oregon vs. Oregon State Washington vs. Washington State Cal vs. Stanford Adding the Holy War would fit very easily into that dynamic. You could do divisions like this: "Mountain" Oregon Oregon State Utah BYU Washington Washington State "Pacific" USC UCLA Cal Stanford Arizona Arizona State The championship game could be played in Glendale (Home of the Cardinals), Los Angeles (Either the Coliseum, Rose Bowl, or the new L.A. stadium down the line), Oakland (A stretch), or Seattle.
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |

Statistics are here! You can now see the number of people who have visited your journal, your individual entries, a chart of comments, readers of the RSS feed of your journal, and the last 100 logged-in users who have visited your journal directly (if you've enabled My Guests). Things you should know: -Stats are completely anonymous (only My Guests is tied to username); only numbers are recorded, not any other information -The times and dates in the graph are based on server time, which is UTC/GMT-The light grey number at the top left corner of the graph is the statistical outlier -While the graph may go back in time to this summer, the stats-gathering server was not on constantly, so previous stats may be missing. Today, and going forward, full stats are collected and displayed. -If you opt out of My Guests (meaning that your username will not show up on other people's reports and you will not be able to view your My Guests tab), it does not affect your use of the rest of the Stats - if you're a Paid or Permanent user, you'll still be able to see all the rest of the information on this feature ( Page-by-page walkthrough )
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |

First the link: http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/15/report-big-ten-to-make-expansion-statement-today/After digging their heels in for so long, it looks as if the Big 10 is ready to expand to 12 teams, which will mean a conference championship game. A lot of teams are being rumored to be targets, but one in particular stands out to me, and that is Pittsburgh. Notre Dame is a lost cause at this point. The school would give up far too much in terms of scheduling control and such to join a conference (Not to mention they currently don't have to share one cent of post-season and television money with anyone). If Pittsburgh were to join, here is how I see the Big 10 divisions shaping up: Eastern Division: Pittsburgh Penn State Ohio State Purdue Indiana Northwestern Western Division: Michigan Michigan State Iowa Illinois Minnesota Wisconsin You have one natural rival in the opposite division (Ensures the Michigan/Ohio State game along with Illinois/Northwestern since they are in the same state but different divisions). You then rotate out of division teams like the SEC does. Another name that has been discussed is Missouri. If that were the case, you'd put Missouri in the West and move Illinois into the East (But Missouri would be Illinois' chief out-of-division rival). If Missouri were to jump ship from the Big 12, it would cause a bigger ripple effect than Pittsburgh leaving the Big East (You could offer an invite to a number of mid-major teams and try to make up with what you lose in basketball as well). The Big 12 would have a hole in the North, which could be filled very nicely by the likes of a Boise or Utah... then again, that's just wishful thinking at this point.
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |

According to a report at The Huffington Post: WASHINGTON — Dismissing complaints from some members that Congress had more pressing matters, a House subcommittee approved legislation Wednesday aimed at forcing college football to switch to a playoff system to determine its national champion. [snip]
The legislation, which still faces steep odds, would ban the promotion of a postseason NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision game as a national championship unless it results from a playoff. The measure passed by voice vote in the House Energy and Commerce Committee's commerce, trade and consumer protection subcommittee, with one audible "no," from Rep. John Barrow, D-Ga. [snip]
The legislation, which goes to the full committee, would make it illegal to promote a national championship game "or make a similar representation," unless it results from a playoff.
There is no Senate version, although Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, has pressed for a Justice Department antitrust investigation into the BCS. [snip] The article does mention that several legislators did point out that perhaps, just maybe, there were more important things for Congress to be dealing with right now.
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |
1-10 Various Actors & Actresses (Keira Knightley, Mia Wasikowkska, Rachel Weisz, Zac Efron, Milo Ventimiglia, Robert Downey Jr.) 11-17 Silence of the Lambs & Blood Creek 18-33 Ashley Greene/Twilight/New Moon 34-49 Leap Year 50-72 Matthew Goode/Brideshead Revisited/A Single Man
+ 6 Banners (Zac Efron, Matthew Goode, The Vampire Diaries, Rachel Weisz, The Black Donnellys) + 5 Animations (Jamie Bell, Brideshead Revisited, Matthew Goode)
Teasers:
(AMMUNITION) @ causticammo
|  |
 |  |  |
|
|
|  |  |
|
 |
|
|  | |
|  |
 |  |
This space would be more useful if you were logged in.
|  |  |
|  |
|